Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Runout Sensor without SD Card, Print Timer support in M104 #4253

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jul 10, 2016

Conversation

thinkyhead
Copy link
Member

@thinkyhead thinkyhead commented Jul 10, 2016

Squashed and rebased #4239

  • Also includes some tweaky changes that produce smaller code by dropping temporary vars and allowing the compiler to decide how to juggle the return values of non-volatile functions.

Enabling runout sensor without SD card as well. For example, for sending g-code from desktop computer (Repetier-Host, slicer etc.) or from Raspberry Pi (octoprint etc.). Print timer is used for this feature (print statistics). We enhanced print timer triggers so bed heating will start timer too, and extruder heating without wait will not start timer:

M104 (extruder without wait) - high temp = none, low temp = stop timer
M109 (extruder with wait) - high temp = start timer, low temp = stop timer
M140 (bed without wait) - none
M190 (bed with wait) - high temp = start timer, low temp = none

@thinkyhead thinkyhead merged commit 3b3e526 into MarlinFirmware:RCBugFix Jul 10, 2016
@thinkyhead thinkyhead deleted the rc_clexpert_runout branch July 10, 2016 02:10
thinkyhead added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 10, 2016
Follow-up the PR #4253 (Runout Sensor without SD Card, Print Timer support in M104), etc
@jbrazio jbrazio modified the milestone: 1.1.0 Jul 18, 2016
@thinkyhead thinkyhead mentioned this pull request Jul 25, 2016
CONSULitAS pushed a commit to CONSULitAS/Marlin-K8200 that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2016
…Print Timer support in M104)

・Update forgotten example configuration files
drewmoseley pushed a commit to drewmoseley/Marlin that referenced this pull request Nov 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants